A regular meeting of the Planning Board of the Township of Roxbury was held on the above date at 7:30 p.m. with Chairman Scott Meyer presiding.  After a salute to the Flag, the Chairman read the “Open Public Meetings Act”.

 

BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:  Scott Meyer, Joseph Schwab, Larry Sweeney, Charles Bautz, Jim Rilee, Steven Alford.  Robert Schultz arrived at 7:35 p.m.

 

ABSENT: Robert DeFillippo, Richard Zoschak, John Ciaramella, Michael Shadiack.

 

PROFESSIONAL STAFF PRESENT:  Tom Germinario, Russell Stern, Paul Ferriero.

 

Also present:  Dolores DeMasi, Board Secretary.

 

Minutes of 2/6/08

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to approve the minutes.  Mr. Sweeney seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Schwab, abstain; Mr. Alford, abstain; Mr. Bautz, abstain; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

RESOLUTIONS

 

PBA-07-036 – MURPHY ROXBURY – WALGREENS – FINAL SITE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON RT. 46, BLOCK 6601, LOT 27 IN B-2 ZONE

 

                                               ROXBURY TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

                                                                                           RESOLUTION

 

 Decided:  February 6, 2008

 Memorialized:  February 20, 2008

 

IN THE MATTER OF MURPHY ROXBURY, LLC/WALGREENS

FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

BLOCK 6601, LOTS 27-31

APPLICATION NO. PBA-07-36

 

WHEREAS, Murphy Roxbury, LLC/Walgreens (hereinafter the "Applicant") applied to the Roxbury Township Planning Board (hereinafter the "Board") for final site plan approval on 11/14/07; and

 

WHEREAS, the application was deemed complete by the Board, and a public hearing were held on 1/16/08 and 2/6/08; and

 

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Applicant has complied with all procedural requirements, rules and  regulations of the Board, and that all required provisions of procedural compliance have been filed with the Board; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board makes the following findings and conclusions based upon the documents, testimony and other evidence comprising the hearing record:

 

1.  The property which is the subject of the application consists of 2.41 acres located in the B-2 Highway Business District.  By Resolution memorialized 5/17/06, Applicant was granted preliminary major site plan approval with variances and design waivers to construct a 14,696 sq. ft. Walgreens Pharmacy and 60-parking spaces.  The Applicant is now before the Board seeking final site plan approval.

 

2.  The development of the subject property to which the Board’s decision herein pertains is depicted and described in the following drawings and/or plans:

 

Prepared by Bohler Engineering – most recently revised June 19, 2007

 

-         Sheet 1, Cover Sheet

-         Sheet 2, Overall Plan

-         Sheet 3, Overall Plan

-         Sheet 4, Overall Plan

-         Sheet 5, Demolition Plan

-         Sheet 6, Site Plan

-         Sheet 7, Grading and Drainage Plan

-         Sheet 8, Utility Plan

-         Sheet 9, Replacement Tree Plan

-         Sheet 10, Landscape Plan

-         Sheet 11, Lighting Plan

-         Sheet 12, Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan

-         Sheet 13, Details

-         Sheet 14, Details

-         Sheet 15, Details

-         Sheet 16, Details

-         Sheet 17, NJDOT Details

-         Sheet 18, Storm Sewer and Water Line Profiles

-         Sheet 19, Sanitary Sewer and Driveway Profiles

-         Sheet 20, Temporary Construction/Storage Trailer Plan

-         Sheet 1 of 2, Truck Circulation Plan (SU-30)

-         Sheet 2 of 2, Truck Circulation Plan (WB-40)

-         Sheet 1 of 1, Steep Slope Plan

 

Prepared by Control Point Associates, Inc.

 

-       Sheet 1 of 1, ALTA / ACSM Land Title (As-Built) Survey,

revised 1/11/08

 

3.  The Board’s planning and engineering professionals and/or consultants submitted the following reports concerning their respective reviews of the application, which are part of the hearing record:

 

Russell Stern, PP, dated 1/15/08, updated 2/4/08

Paul Ferriero, PE, dated 1/8/08 and 2/1/08

 

4.  In the course of the public hearing, no exhibits were marked and are part of the hearing record.

 

5.  In the course of the public hearing, the Applicant was represented by                Larry Kron, Esq., and the Applicant presented the testimony of the following witnesses, which testimony is part of the hearing record:

 

Lawrence Murphy, PE, Applicant’s engineer

 

6.  The Board finds that the Applicant has constructed the project substantially in accordance with the approved preliminary site plans, subject to the completion of those items set forth in the conditions herein below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board does hereby approve the final site plan as depicted and described in the drawings and/or plans referenced hereinabove.  This approval authorizes immediate issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy for Walgreen’s (subject to Construction Official approval) for purposes of interior fit-out and internal stocking only.  A permanent certificate of occupancy is required to open the facility to the public.

 

This approval is subject to the following conditions which shall, unless otherwise stated, be satisfied prior to the issuance of a Walgreen’s permanent certificate of occupancy:

 

1.  The following items pertaining to the Walgreen’s site shall be bonded and completed by 5/31/08:

 

(a)           Replace drive canopy drop lights with lenses flush with the canopy.

(b)           Install base plate covers on freestanding lights.

(c)           Fine grade and mulch shall be completed along the backside of the board on board fence facing Smiles and BJs.  Silt fence shall be removed.

(d)           Install caps on handicap signs located at the building entrance.

(e)           Complete the grading of the emergency spillway.

(f)            Complete the striping of the loading area.

(g)           Sidewalk and pavement shall be cleaned.

(h)           Complete final grading of the site.

(i)            Complete the installation of landscaping.

(j)            The grass spillway of the detention basin shall be cut to grade.

(k)           Complete the installation and painting of bollards. Re-install decorative bollards.

(l)            Install benches and trash/ash receptacles.

(m)          Complete the installation of the irrigation system.

(n)           Replace ‘IGC’ along the building foundation in marginal condition with Japanese Yew.

(o)           Verify the installation of the Typar root biobarrier (or equivalent) along the face of the sidewalk. 

 

2.  In connection with this approval, a design waiver is granted with respect to Section 13-8.809F, since the unfinished side of the Walgreen’s fence faces adjoining properties.  This shall be addressed by capping and boxing in the galvanized fence posts to the satisfaction of the Township Planner.  This work shall be bonded and completed by 5/31/08.

 

3.  The following items pertaining to the Walgreen’s site shall be completed prior to issuance of a Walgreen’s permanent Certificate of Occupancy:

 

(a)           Submit Certificate of Compliance from Morris County Soil Conservation District.

(b)           Install drive-thru canopy height sign;

(c)           Repair cracked building sidewalk along the southwesterly building elevation.  Install redesigned sidewalk to connect with Route 46 sidewalk.

(d)           Cut sidewalk expansion joints flush to sidewalk.

(e)           In accordance with the preliminary site plan approval (sheet 6 of engineering and sheet A2.1 of architectural drawings), the two rear rooftop mechanical units located at the easterly building corner shall be screened from the adjoining properties and streets; materials shall be compatible with the building architecture; color coated “Kynar” screening may be appropriate.

(f)            Striped parking stalls within the access easement to Smiles shall be removed.

(g)           Repair of the inlet located on the Smiles access easement shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Township/Board Engineer.

(h)           Asphalt, per the direction of the Township Engineer, shall be provided around the manhole located on the Smiles access easement.

(i)            Install trash enclosure/compactor gates.

(j)            Complete the installation of the freestanding monument sign.

(k)           Remove debris, trash containers, and portable toilet.

 

4.  The following items pertaining to the McDonalds site shall be bonded and completed by 5/31/08:

 

(a)           Repaint the relocated freestanding light and remove sonotube.

(b)           Complete the installation of landscaping.

(c)           Complete final grading of the site.

(d)           Re-stripe the center and easterly parking bays as shown on the approved plans.

(e)           Continue blue handicap pavement striping, across from the drive-thru, as depicted on the approved plans.  Remove wheelchair figure.

(f)  Verify the installation of the Typar root biobarrier (or equivalent) along the face of the sidewalk.

 

5.  The following items pertaining to the McDonalds site shall be completed prior to issuance of a Walgreen’s permanent Certificate of Occupancy:

 

(a)           Complete the installation of the trash/recycling enclosure gates.

(b)           Complete the removal/abandonment of the existing septic system per the Health Department and NJDEP regulations.

(c)           Remove debris.

(d)           Verify the functioning of all freestanding lights illuminating the McDonalds traffic aisle connecting Walgreens to Route 46.

 

6.  The following items shall be addressed prior to issuance of a Certification of Occupancy (parentheticals refer to conditions of preliminary approval):

 

(a)           Sheet 1 of the Bohler Engineering drawings shall be labeled as “Final Major Site Plan.”

(b)           Applicant shall provide deeds verifying the lot consolidation to the satisfaction of the Board Attorney (condition 30).

(c)           Filed deeds addressing the access and utility easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Board Attorney (condition 34 and 51).

(d)           Payment of the mandatory affordable housing development fee shall be verified (condition 57).

(e)           Payment of off-tract and off-site pro-rata contributions shall be verified (condition 56).

(f)            Payment of all appropriate fees and taxes shall be verified (condition 62).

(g)           Verify payment of a lot line revision fee (condition 26).

 

7.             In accordance with preliminary condition 5, window signs (temporary and/or permanent) are forbidden in the Walgreens building.

 

8.  The exterior storage of pallets is prohibited (per note number 52 on sheet 6 of the preliminary site plan).

 

9.  This approval is subject to all other approvals required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the subject property.

 

10.  This approval is subject to the payment in full by the Applicant of all taxes, fees, escrows, assessments and other amounts due and owing to the Township and/or any agency thereof.

 

11.  If the Soil Conservation District, Morris County Planning Board, or any other governmental body from which approval is necessary causes, through their examination of the plans as recited in this resolution, any revisions to said plans then, in that event, same shall be submitted to the Planning Board Engineer.  If the Planning Board Engineer deems said revisions to be significant, the Applicant shall return to the Planning Board for further review and approval.

 

12.  Revised plans shall be submitted within 60 days and must be deemed complete to the satisfaction of the Board Engineer within 6 months of the date of memorialization.  Failure on the part of the Applicant to satisfy this or any other condition of this resolution will result in referral of this matter back to the Planning Board for purposes of deeming the approval null and void.

 

The undersigned does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Resolution of the Roxbury Township Planning Board memorializing the action taken by the Board at its meeting of 2/6/08.

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to approve the resolution.  Mr. Sweeney seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

PBA-01-08 – STEIN MART – MINOR SITE PLAN FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN LOCATED IN ROXBURY MALL, BLOCK 5004, LOT 7 IN B-3 ZONE

 

                                               ROXBURY TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD

                                                                                           RESOLUTION

 

 Decided:  February 6, 2008

 Memorialized:  February 20, 2008

 

IN THE MATTER OF STEIN MART/ROXVILLE ASSOC. & FIDELITY MANAGEMENT

MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL

BLOCK 5004, LOT 5

APPLICATION NO. PBA-08-01

 

WHEREAS, Stein Mart/Roxville Assoc. & Fidelity Management (hereinafter the "Applicant") applied to the Roxbury Township Planning Board (hereinafter the "Board") for minor site plan approval on 11/30/07; and

 

WHEREAS, the application was deemed complete by the Board, and a public hearing was held on 2/6/08; and

 

WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Applicant has complied with all procedural requirements, rules and  regulations of the Board, and that all required provisions of procedural compliance have been filed with the Board; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board makes the following findings and conclusions based upon the documents, testimony and other evidence comprising the hearing record:

 

1.  The property which is the subject of the application is known as Roxbury Mall, containing Stein Mart, Shop Rite, Home Depot and Staples, encompasses 25.63 acres located in the B-3 Planned Shopping Center District.

 

2.  The development of the subject property proposed by the Applicant comprises minor site plan approval for a front entry façade renovation that was constructed near the end of 2007.  Permission is necessary from the Board as the façade height is 35 feet while the ordinance allows 28 feet height, unless approval is granted by the Planning Board.  The “Stein Mart” sign conforms to code and was constructed in accordance with its zoning permit.

 

3.  The proposed development of the subject property to which the Board’s decision herein pertains is depicted and described in the following drawings and/or plans:

 

Prepared by Richard J. Diedrich

 

-                    Sheet A-4, Schedules and Elevations,

                revised 11/20/07

 

4.  In support of the application, the Applicant submitted the following documents, which are part of the hearing record:

 

Minor Site Plan Application, dated 11/30/07

 

5.  The Board’s planning and engineering professionals and/or consultants submitted the following reports concerning their respective reviews of the application, which are part of the hearing record:

 

Russell Stern, AICP, PP, CLA, dated 1/31/08

 

6.  In the course of the public hearings, no exhibits were marked as part of the hearing record.

 

7.  In the course of the public hearings, the Applicant was represented by Larry Kron, Esq., and the Applicant presented the testimony of the following witnesses, which testimony is part of the hearing record:

 

David Voight, Applicant’s Director of Development

 

8.  The development of the subject property as proposed by the Applicant requires relief from the following land use provisions of the Township ordinances:

 

Pursuant to Section 13-7.2602D7, no building in the B-3 District shall exceed a height of 28 feet; “... however, design elements such as clock towers, sky lights, entrance treatments and similar features shall be permitted at the discretion of the Board but in no case exceed a 50 foot height from grade to top of roof.”  Approval is necessary from the Board as the front entry building façade has a height of 35 feet.

 

9.  Based on the hearing record, the Board has made the following findings relative to the relief sought by the Applicant:

 

The Board finds that the proposed façade treatment is compatible with surrounding architectural facades in the Roxbury Mall and that the height of the façade will not have a negative visual or aesthetic impact.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board does hereby approve the minor site plan as depicted and described in the drawings and/or plans referenced hereinabove.

 

This approval is subject to the following condition:

 

1.  The lot number shall be corrected on the application form and file to indicate Lot 5.

 

2.  This approval is subject to all other approvals required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the subject property.

 

3.  This approval is subject to the payment in full by the Applicant of all taxes, fees, escrows, assessments and other amounts due and owing to the Township and/or any agency thereof.

 

The undersigned does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Resolution of the Roxbury Township Planning Board memorializing the action taken by the Board at its meeting of 2/6/08.

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to approve the resolution.  Mr. Sweeney seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

AGENDA

 

PBA-07-11 – R. J. INVESTORS – SITE PLAN FOR HOME ON STEEP SLOPES LOCATED ON ROOSEVELT WAY, BLOCK 9707, LOT 15 IN R-3 ZONE

 

Mr. Meyer stated the attorney for the applicant, Larry Kron, wrote a letter to the Board stating the applicant wishes to withdraw the application.

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to deny the application without prejudice.  Mr. Bautz seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Bautz, yes; Mr. Schwab, yes; Mr. Alford, yes; Mr. Schultz, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

PBA-07-25 – ETEL REALTY – SITE PLAN FOR RETAIL STORE LOCATED ON RT. 206, BLOCK 9201, LOT 2

 

Attorneys Fredric Azrak and Peter MacArthur represented the applicant.

 

Mr. Azrak said they met with the professionals and will address the reports.  He referred to the concept landscape rendering revised 2/19/08 (marked A-20) in response to comments from Mr. Stern and stated they agree to all the landscaping comments. 

 

Mr. Stern said he hasn’t reviewed the plan, but pursuant to a letter from Mr. Miller, he agrees to all the landscape comments.

 

Mr. Azrak said the architect has submitted plans showing the awnings required by Mr. Stern.  In regard to a question by Mr. Ferriero, we have submitted a letter dated 2/4/08 from Amy Greene that addresses the concerns regarding the buffers.  Mr. Miller also sent a letter which was referred to by Mr. Stern.

 

Mr. MacArthur stated the applicant agrees to all items in both letters with the exception of items we will discuss here and resolve.

 

The applicant addressed Mr. Ferriero’s 2/15/08 memo:

 

Section 1

 

IIe1 and IIIc – Stormwater Management Plan and manuals have been submitted.

 

Mr. Ferriero said he received them yesterday but has not reviewed them.  He will work out any discrepancies with the applicant.

 

IIc1 – Will submit final versions of the NJDOT plans for the septic system when received by the applicant.

 

Mr. Rilee asked if there is an approval from the Health Department on the new septic.

 

Mr. Bodolsky said yes.  They had approved it with caveats.

 

IIc2 – fence detail has been submitted

 

H1 – condition of approval – has been submitted

 

Detail for concrete island is part of the DOT construction plan – copies of those plans will be submitted to the Board.  The entrance/exit will be tapered to not permit left in and left out of the site.

 

Mr. Rilee asked if there is “No Left Turn” signage that needs to be signed off on by DOT. 

 

Chuck Olivo was present and stated there is signage that will be required for left turn prohibition into and out of the site.  It will most likely be a symbolic sign.

 

J1 – Mr. Bodolsky said the plan is subject to NJDOT

 

III a and b – applicant agrees to provide detail showing how fill will be placed

 

Mr. Ferriero said that addresses his report.

 

The applicant addressed Mr. Stern’s report of 2/15/08:

 

Applicant agrees to all items except those being addressed now.

 

1.1  – Mr. MacArthur described the changes that have been made to the plans:

 

• Building size decreased
• Planting island eliminated and handicap spaces moved
• Eliminated two parking spaces in front of building
• Moved northerly retaining wall to a conforming setback
• Shortened front elevation of building 11 feet to allow for repositioning of stormwater facilities and allows for additional planting
• Widened loading area
• Relocated three spaces behind the building and one away from the septic area
• Increased separation of septic system from curbline
• Applicant is committing to keystone retaining wall

 

Mr. Bodolsky stated he had forwarded a letter from Paul Beck Associates, a structural engineer, and that confirms that the northerly retaining wall will be designed with uniform keystone construction

 

Mr. Stern asked the color and type of the keystone block.

 

Mr. Kloss stated he will submit samples prior to construction, as part of the conditions of approval.

 

Mr. Meyer asked about he color of the band across the top of the building.

 

Mr. Kloss said it will probably be a beige split faced block around all four sides of the whole building.  There may be a stucco band on top.

 

Discussion.

 

It was determined the building will be done as shown on the plans, but with split faced block in the band in an earth tone color and some more visual interest.  Any deviation to the plans will be submitted to Mr. Stern who will forward them to the Board members.

 

Item 1.11 – Mr. MacArthur stated there is a well on the property.  We will pay for what we are responsible for.  We would like to get some clarification.

 

Mr. Bodolsky said the Kiddie Academy resolution said they were obligated to tie into the water system when it became available.  They have expended a good amount of money for their own well, sprinkler system and fire suppression.  I believe, after speaking to Mr. Kobylarz, that Mr. Germinario made a determination that it is a dead issue and that the Board can’t compel Kiddie Academy to tie into the water system at this point in time.  We are 700 feet from Gold Mine Road, which is the terminus of the water system.  There is nothing in the regulations that would compel us to bring water up, and there wouldn’t be any pro rata share.

 

Mr. Stern said today Mr. Kobylarz had a discussion with the engineer for Kiddie Academy and they have expressed an interest now in exploring the possibility of extending that line.  I would assume, if it becomes a reality and the line is extended, this applicant would want to tie into that.

 

Mr. Kloss said he will build the pipe and would eventually connect to it. 

 

Mr. Stern said he thinks there is a need, since they have expressed interest, to communicate with the engineer of Kiddie Academy of the possibility of having the line extended.

 

Mr. Kloss said we would pick it up from Kiddie Academy’s line, not from 700 feet away.

 

Mr. Bodolsky said we need clarification on the pro rata share.

 

Mr. Germinario said the way it is written now, you would have to extend the line.  What we are going to say is that you are going to exercise reasonable efforts to come to some agreement with Kiddie Academy for the extension of the line and then pay the pro rata share?  It would be pro rata between Kiddie Academy and this applicant.

 

Mr. Bodolsky said these are not the only properties that front that line.  There is Meier Stone on the corner; a house north of Meier Stone; then Kiddie Academy.  In fairness, it should include all of those properties.  

 

Mr. Rilee said it would be your fair share in extending a water line or any other public enhancement to the area and you would pay your share.

 

Mr. Meyer said it seems to be standard language.  There would be a determination by the Township Engineer and you could either agree or disagree with him at the time.

 

Mr. Ferriero said there are 4 lots there.  Kiddie Academy wants to do it.  Their fair share is 70% and Ethel’s share is 20%.  That pays for 90% of the line, but if the other people aren’t interested, the line doesn’t get built.  This is not a municipal improvement where the municipality is being reimbursed.  This is the developer extending the line.  That makes the pro rata share more complicated.   Would it be possible to say that if Kiddie Academy extends the line to their site, then ETEL could pick it up from there and bring it to their property.

 

Mr. Germinario said that would work only in that circumstance.  Then there would be no pro rata share.

 

Mr. Azrak said we would agree to pick it up from the midway point of the property line +/- 1- feet.

 

Item 1.13 – agreed

Item 1.14 – agreed

Item 1.15 – agreed

Item 2.2 –Mr. Azrak said the DEP will require a conservation easement to the final transition line.

 

Mr. Rilee asked if we can stipulate that if the DEP does not accept it, it would go to the town.

 

Mr. MacArthur said yes.

 

Item 3.1 – Mr. Stern will be provided with samples

 

Item 4.1 - Traffic – will note drawings to make sure left turns into the site will be prohibited.

Item 4.2 - Signage will be provided.

Item 4.3 – Mr. Olivo stated the project is under review by the DOT.  They will not finish the review until they receive a letter from DEP stating the status of the project.

 

Mr. Germinario said we will require that the DOT permits be obtained prior to construction.

 

Item 5.2 – agreed

Item 6.1 – agreed

 

Waiver from sidewalks is agreed to

Waiver required for height of trash enclosure – agreed to

 

Item 7.1 – variance required for sign setback will be noted on title sheet

Item 7.2 – agreed

Item 8.1 – design waiver for light – agreed to

Item 8.3 – agreed

Remaining comments have been addressed

 

Mr. Stern stated as a result of the site easement, street trees cannot be provided.  The street trees have been located within the property as well as ornamental trees – design waiver required.

 

Mr. Azrak stated we have worked diligently with the Board , planner, engineer and attorney.  We were able to get through all of the comments and come to agreements.  We have attempted to make this as variance free as possible.  We have submitted testimony on the steep slopes.  I believe we have come to a point of agreement with the professionals and the Board.  We are applying for the variances and design waivers and preliminary and final site plan approval.

 

Mr. Germinario recommended that this be approved only for preliminary site plan.  The final approval will be subject to as builts being submitted.

 

There was no public present.

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to approve the preliminary site plan application with all stipulations agreed to.  Mr. Bautz seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Bautz, yes; Mr. Schwab, yes; Mr. Schultz, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

There was a 10 minute recess at 8:25 p.m.

 

PBA-07-32 - ETEL REALTY – SOIL APPLICATION FOR RETAIL STORES LOCATED ON RT. 206, BLOCK 9201, LOT 2 IN A B-2 ZONE

 

Attorney Fredric Azrak represented the applicant. 

 

Mr. Bodolsky stated the site falls away from the road and we need to import a large amount of material.  A small amount of topsoil will be exported from the site.  The quantities are 989 cy of export and import of 8,534 cy.  The route of travel will be Route 206 and Route 80.  If we choose a source in town, it will be a permitted source, such as the Villages site which would have the same route of travel.  The exported soil will go Rt. 206 to Rt. 80 or Rt. 206 south.  No soil will be trucked on weekends. We request the standard hours on weekdays.

 

Mr. Ferriero said the fees will be determined by the Township Engineer and a $3,000 soil moving bond will be required. 

 

Mr. Alford asked if the no left turn in and no left turn out will apply during soil moving.

 

Mr. Bodolsky said yes.

 

Mr. Rilee made a motion to approve the application.  Mr. Schwab seconded.

 

Roll as follows:  Mr. Rilee, yes; Mr. Schwab, yes; Mr. Schultz, yes; Mr. Bautz, yes; Mr. Alford, yes; Mr. Sweeney, yes; Mr. Meyer, yes.

 

The meeting was adjourned by motion at 8:40 p.m.

 

                                                            Dolores A. DeMasi, Secretary

 

lm/